Showing posts with label media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label media. Show all posts

Thursday, October 25, 2007

Christocracy High Priestess Ann Coulter on Perfecting Jews

Swedish: Kristokratin är i grunden antisemitisk (och antihinduisk, antibuddhistisk o.s.v.) eftersom fundamentalister inte tillåter att andra religioner existerar som fullvärdiga alternativ till den egna tron. Mycket av den religiösa ivern ägnas åt att omvända andra. Ann Coulter är en fullblodskristokrat. Hon är också en av de mer högljudda hatpredikanterna i USA (se länkar nedan).

Christocracy is basically and profoundly Anti-Semitic (and Anti-Hinduic, Anti-Buddhistic etc.) since fundamentalists are incapable of allowing other religions to exist as equal alternatives to their own faith. Much of the religious frenzy is directed into proselyting. Ann Coulter is a Blue Blood Christocrat. She is also the Goddess of Hate Preaching in the USA:

Coulter: "[P]rofiling Muslims is more like profiling the Klan"

Coulter lauded discrimination against Arab, Middle Eastern

Coulter: Islam is "a car-burning cult"

Coulter: "If we took away women's right to vote, we'd never have to worry about another Democrat president"

Coulter: "I don't think there's anything offensive about any variation of faggy, faggotry, faggot, fag

President Coulter? Right-wing pundit proposed "carpet-bomb[ing]" Iran when asked -- again -- by a Fox host what she would do as president

More from Media Matters on Coutler's Anti-Semitic remarks (O'Reilly to Coulter: "I don't even care, to tell you the truth" about Coulter's controversial comments): O'Reilly did not note that several Jewish organizations have denounced her comments, including the American Jewish Congress, the Anti-Defamation League, the American Jewish Committee, and the Simon Wiesenthal Center.

About her book "Godless: The Church of Liberalism":

Andra bloggar om: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , - Intressant

Technorati: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

SvD kristokratins nya språkrör i Sverige?

English further down

Nyligen meddelade Per Gudmundson att han blivit erbjuden fast anställning: Jag gratulerar mig själv. Varför inte samtidigt passa på att gratulera läsarna av denna tidning till att man snart kan få öppna SvD, Kristokratins Språkrör i Sverige, till frukosten. Steget från antytt islamhat i SvD: Svenskarna som vill dö för islam till dagens öppet islamofobiska inlägg på Gudmundsons privata blogg och vidare i den renodlade är mycket kort om man skrapar på ytan.

Hitchens om islamofascism

I USA pågår Islamo-fascism awareness week, nyttan av vilken man kan diskutera. Det har föranlett Christopher Hitchens att reda ut varifrån begreppet kommer.

Taget helt ur sitt sammanhang kan det ju vara bra med en vecka som gör USA medvetet om de fascistiska dragen i den militanta islamismen (som om något annat hördes där). Det borde dock förvåna att Gudmundson låter två militanta f.d. vänsterextremister som (ex)leninisten David Horowitz , initiativtagare till "awareness week", och (ex)trotskisten Hitchens bli språkrör för denna "upplysningskampanj". Det finns inget som tyder på att dessa neokonservativa herrar lämnat det totalitära bakom sig.

Som framgick i Target Iran: Robertson and Podhoretz on Antisemitism så ser vi idag en ohelig allians mellan den ogudaktiga neokonservatismen och den gudsfruktande kristokratin. Vad som inte framgick där är dels de rötter som neokonservatismen har i det som idag kallas extremvänstern, särskilt trotskismen, och i vilken utsträckning den kristokratiska rörelsen lånat metoder från kommunistisk infiltration, cellbildning, maktövertagande genom att dölja sin ideologi o.s.v. Neokonservatismen är inget annat än samma mentalitet som präglade (präglar?) trotskisternas "ständiga revolution", fast med andra förtecken.

Det auktoritära draget kommer tydligt fram i den här tidigare publicerade videon Pat Robertson Nazi Moment med ett helt samtal mellan Robertson och Horowitz om The 101 Most Dangerous Professors in America på The Christian Broadcasting Network, d.v.s. Robertsons gigantiska medieföretag.

Personen som syns t.v. en kort stund i början är David Horowitz. Det är alltså inget problem för en person som påstår sig kämpa mot extremism - den islamistiska varianten - att lovordas av en av de mer extrema kristokraterna i världen. Det går att fylla spaltmeter med allt Robertson ägnat sig åt från att skylla 9/11 på synden i USA till homofobiska utfall. Detta är lite mer konkreta och väldokumenterade beröringspunkter än när Gudmundson försökte smutskasta bl.a. Noam Chomsky för att Usama bin Ladin nämnt honom.

När kommer Gudmundson och svenskans ledarredaktion att överhuvudtaget nämna den militanta kristna högern som ett hot värt att ta på lika stort allvar som islamismen?

Ett litet, litet avsteg från det rena kristokratiska argumenten (mot islamism, demonisering av islam i största allmänhet o.s.v.) kan möjligen skönjas i

Fortsatt stopp för kreationism på biologin

men det är långt ifrån entydigt vad Gudmundson och SvD egentligen vill ha sagt. "Regelverk är bra", men sen då?

Will Svenska Dagbladet become The Voice of Christocracy in Sweden?

A short summary in English: Svenska Dagbladet (SvD) is the second most important daily newspaper in Sweden. Per Gudmundson has been a very controversial blogger on the far right here in Sweden. Since a few days back, Gudmunson will be a permanent member of the editorial team on SvD. There he will continue to spread anti-Islam opinions and be a voice for extremists like David Horowitz and his Islamo-fascism awareness week (still only on the blogg). There is no Christo-Fascism-Awarenes to be seen in SvD or on the blogg. Not a single word about the continuing take-over by the Christocracy movement in the US. Not a single word about the more neutral concept The Christian Right, apart from denouncing its mere existence. Period.

Andra bloggar om: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , - Intressant

Technorati: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, October 11, 2007

War Plan IRAN moves ahead smoothely

The tricks and lies used by the Bush administration to get support for the War on Iraq, the Occupation of Iraq, the Plundering of Iraq has been covered in shocking detail. Even before the attack it was very, very obvious to literate individuals what was going on. Here is a review of "War Plan Iraq," by Milan Rai, published on December 18, 2002. That was three months before the attack, so the book must have been written much earlier.

Video from Robert Greenwald, director of Iraq for Sale: The War Profiteers (Google copy: move mouse pointer here to watch the full movie)

FOX ATTACKS IRAN

Sign the Open Letter

Tell the networks not to follow FOX down the road to war

Andra bloggar om: , , , , , , , , , , , , , - Intressant

Technorati: , Media, , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, October 9, 2007

American Dreams of Holocaust (Nugent fan)

(Just imagine: A muslim posting a picture of a gun!)

The Swedish right is just as obsessed with Islam and Islamism as the US original. (Per Gudmundson is not considered as a right-wing fringe individual, as one might suspect, but is writing on the editorial page of Svenska Dagbladet, the second most important daily newspaper in Sweden.) Of course it's a valuable contribution to document militant Islamism, but why at the same time downplaying Christian extremism? Why not be honest and accept the fact that militant Islamism - islamofascism - is still a minority business in the Islamic world while Christo-Fascism has the might of the US Army, the Republican Party and the White house as avid supporters?

(Kommentar om tags nedan: Amerikansk kristokrati har som främsta mål en ny förintelse. Utan utplånandet av alla icke-kristna kan inte Guds Plan och Kristi Återkomst förverkligas. Det sista slaget kommer naturligtvis att utspelas precis där staten Israel ligger. Hur många överlevande kan vi räkna med den här gången? - Det här behöver inte ens översättas till engelska eftersom alla eventuella besökare från USA är medvetna om detta faktum.)

Is this a Right-Wing Nut or a member of the US Mainstream Right?

Video: Ted Nugent is thermo-nuclear weapon of all mankind. Once that bomb blows up, he wipes out the anti-s, he wipes out the liberalism .... Ted is the Number One American ....

Video courtesy "Don't Burn the Flag. Wash it!", who comments:

What is one of the bigger problems facing the USA today?

Watch this short video and then answer that question.

This man is not to be made fun, he is to be pitied. He is a product of people like Ted Nugent, and Ted Nugent is a product of other Ted Nugent’s, and they are all the byproduct of years and years of the (1) dumbing down of the American education system, particularly K through 12, (2) which includes the educators. They are a product as well of (3) the lack of any worthy historical perspectives and of (4) the growing divide and disconnect between the rich and the middleclass/poor.

Another video clip from a totally alien universe where up is down and down is up, truth is lies, and lies are truth: "Hannity: I want to know. Barack Obama accused our troops of killing civilians and air-raiding villages. What is more offensive to you, which statement? - From a collection of Hannity clips at FOXATTACKS.

Sean Hannity on FOX News defending Ted Nugent (video)

NUGENT [video clip]: I was in Chicago. I said, "Hey, Obama, you might want to suck on one of these, you punk!"

Obama, he's a piece of [bleep]. And I told him to suck on my machine gun. Let's hear it for it.

And I was in New York. I said, "Hey, Hillary, you might want to ride one of these into the sunset, you worthless [bleep]!"

HANNITY: That was friend and frequent guest on the program Ted Nugent expressing his feelings towards Democratic presidential contenders Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton. Joining us now, Democratic strategist Bob Beckel and Republican strategist Karen Hanretty.

You know, Bob, we may actually agree here. Here is Ted Nugent. He's saying, you know, the "Wang Dang" song, "Cat Scratch Fever," wears a loincloth on stage, fires, you know, an arrow at targets on stage. I see you liberals more upset about that, but I don't hear anybody criticizing Barack Obama for accusing our troops of killing civilians, air-raiding villages, et cetera, et cetera. What's more shocking to you? What's more offensive to you? Is it Barack Obama's statement about our troops or Ted Nugent?

BECKEL: You know, only you could figure out a way to ask a question like that. First of all, Nugent, this is a boy who's missing a couple dogs from under his front porch. This guy has been pimping for Republicans for years now. They want him to run for Senate against Obama. I can't believe -- when the Dixie Chicks said something about George Bush, which was mild compared to this jerk, and the religious right, the Dobsons and the Robertsons, rose up in fury. You rose up in fury.

[crosstalk]

HANNITY: You know, typical Bob Beckel. But you can't answer the question. I didn't ask you that.

BECKEL: I want to see --

[crosstalk]

BECKEL: Are you prepared now, Sean -- are you prepared to disavow this lowlife or not?

HANNITY: No, I like Ted Nugent. He's a friend of mine.

BECKEL: You do, after did he that? After he did that?

HANNITY: But he's a rock star. Yes, here's my point. If you don't like it, don't go to the concert, don't buy his new albums.

[crosstalk]

BECKEL: I can't believe you're defending this lowlife.

HANNITY: Here's my question again, and hopefully your liberal brain can absorb it.

[crosstalk]

BECKEL: The question is not even a close call. I think Nugent was far over the line and Obama was not.

HANNITY: I want to know. Barack Obama accused our troops of killing civilians and air-raiding villages. What is more offensive to you, which statement?

BECKEL: Because I know the context in which Obama said it. This Nugent is more offensive. This guy ought to be knocked off the air. He ought to never come on your show again, and if you have him on, you ought to be ashamed of yourself. He's a bum!

HANNITY: Not at all. We have you on.

Andra bloggar om: , , , , , , , , , , , - Intressant

Technorati: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,,